IEA Energy Technology Perspectives 2020 Special Report on Clean Energy Innovation (OECD Publishing, 2020).
Energy Technology RD&D Budgets (IEA) (accessed 31 May 2024); https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/energy-technology-rd-and-d-budget-database-2
OECD Data Explorer (OECD) (accessed 31 May 2024); https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?r=814876
Hourihan, M. A Primer on Federal R&D Budget Trends (AAAS, 2021).
Bertram, C. et al. Energy system developments and investments in the decisive decade for the Paris Agreement goals. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 074020 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kreibiehl, S. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) 1547–1640 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
World Energy Investment 2024 (IEA, 2024).
Pugh, G. et al. Energy R&D portfolio analysis based on climate change mitigation. Energy Econ. 33, 634–643 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kurth, M. et al. A portfolio decision analysis approach to support energy research and development resource allocation. Energy Policy 105, 128–135 (2017).
Google Scholar
Olaleye, O. & Baker, E. Large scale scenario analysis of future low carbon energy options. Energy Econ. 49, 203–216 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nagy, B., Farmer, J. D., Bui, Q. M. & Trancik, J. E. Statistical basis for predicting technological progress. PLoS ONE 8, e52669 (2013).
Google Scholar
Kavlak, G., McNerney, J. & Trancik, J. E. Evaluating the causes of cost reduction in photovoltaics modules. Energy Policy 123, 700–710 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gambhir, A., et al. How are future energy technology costs estimated? Can we do better? Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 15, 271–318 (2021).
Google Scholar
Verdolini, E., Anadón, L. D., Baker, E., Bosetti, V. & Aleluia Reis, L. Future prospects for energy technologies: insights from expert elicitations. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 12, 133–153 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nemet, G. F. Improving the crystal ball. Nat. Energy 6, 860–861 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nemet, G. F., Baker, E. & Jenni, K. E. Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts’ elicited probabilities under policy scenarios. Energy 56, 218–228 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gabriel, S. A., Conejo, A. J., Fuller, J. D., Hobbs, B. F. & Ruiz, C. Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets (Springer, 2013).
Bosetti, V. et al. Sensitivity to energy technology costs: a multi-model comparison analysis. Energy Policy 80, 244–263 (2015).
Google Scholar
Pless, J., Hepburn, C. & Farrell, N. Bringing rigour to energy innovation policy evaluation. Nat. Energy 5, 284–290 (2020).
Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G. Our knowledge of the world is often not simple: policymakers should not duck that fact, but should deal with it. Risk Anal. 35, 19–20 (2015).
Google Scholar
Popper, S. W., et al. Natural Gas and Israel’s Energy Future: Near-Term Decisions from a Strategic Perspective (RAND Corporation, 2009).
Guivarch, C. et al. Using large ensembles of climate change mitigation scenarios for robust insights. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 428–435 (2022).
Google Scholar
Baker, E., Bosetti, V. and Salo, A. Robust portfolio decision analysis: an application to the energy research and development portfolio problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 284, 1107–1120 (2020).
Sivaram, V., Cunliff, C., Hart, D., Friedmann, J.& Sandalow, D. Energizing America (Columbia University SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy, 2020).
Chong, H. Closing the Gap: Priorities for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Building RD&D Portfolio (Information Technology and Innovation Foundation Center for Clean Energy Innovation, 2022).
IEA Energy Innovation Forum 2024 (IEA, 2024).
Trancik J. E. et al. Technology Improvement and Emissions Reductions as Mutually Reinforcing Efforts: Observations from the Global Development of Solar and Wind Energy (Institute for Data, Systems and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015).
U.S. Leadership and the Historic Paris Agreement to Combat Climate Change (Obama White House Archives, 2015).
Multi-Year Program Plan (US Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED), 2023).
Innovation Fund Progress Report (European Union, 2023).
Clarke, L. & Baker, E. Workshop Report: RD&D Portfolio Analysis Tools and Methodologies (Joint Global Change Research Institute, 2011).
Allen, A. et al. End-to-end data-driven weather prediction. Nature 641, 1172–1179 (2025).
Google Scholar
Shrader, J. G., Bakkensen, L. & Lemoine, D. Fatal Errors: the Mortality Value of Accurate Weather Forecasts Working Paper 31361 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2023).
Eash-Gates, P. et al. Sources of cost overrun in nuclear power plant construction call for a new approach to engineering design. Joule 4, 2348–2373 (2020).
Wang, N., Akimoto, K. & Nemet, G. F. What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects. Energy Policy 158, 112546 (2021).
Google Scholar
Way, R., Ives, M. C., Mealy, P. & Farmer, J. D. Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition. Joule 6, 2057–2082 (2022).
Google Scholar
Grant, N., Hawkes, A., Mittal, S. & Gambhir, A. The policy implications of an uncertain carbon dioxide removal potential. Joule 5, 2593–2605 (2021).
Google Scholar
Klemun, M. M., Kavlak, G., McNerney, J. & Trancik, J. E. Mechanisms of hardware and soft technology evolution and the implications for solar energy cost trends. Nat. Energy 8, 827–838 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lafond, F. et al. How well do experience curves predict technological progress? A method for making distributional forecasts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 128, 104–117 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shayegh, S., Sanchez, D. L. & Caldeira, K. Evaluating relative benefits of different types of R&D for clean energy technologies. Energy Policy 107, 532–538 (2017).
Google Scholar
Santhakumar, S., Meerman, H. & Faaij, A. Improving the analytical framework for quantifying technological progress in energy technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 145, 111084 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tsai, P. H. et al. Quantitative technology forecasting: a review of trend extrapolation methods. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 20, 2330002 (2023).
Way, R., Lafond, F., Lillo, F., Panchenko, V. & Farmer, J. D. Wright meets Markowitz: how standard portfolio theory changes when assets are technologies following experience curves. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 101, 211–238 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nuñez-Jimenez, A., Knoeri, C., Hoppmann, J. & Hoffmann, V. H. Beyond innovation and deployment: modeling the impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies in Germany’s solar policy mix. Res. Policy 51, 104585 (2022).
Google Scholar
McNerney, J., Farmer, J. D., Redner, S. & Trancik, J. E. Role of design complexity in technology improvement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9008–9013 (2011).
Google Scholar
Morgan, G. Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision-making for public policy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7176–7184 (2014).
Google Scholar
Meng, J., Way, R., Verdolini, E. & Anadon, L. D. Comparing expert elicitation and model-based probabilistic technology cost forecasts for the energy transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e1917165118 (2021).
Trancik, J. E. Testing and improving technology forecasts for better climate policy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2109417118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Albright, R. What can past technology forecasts tell us about the future? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 69, 443–464 (2002).
Google Scholar
Apreda, R., Bonaccorsi, A., dell’Orletta, F. & Fantoni, G. Expert forecast and realized outcomes in technology foresight. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 141, 277–288 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kott, A. & Perconti, P. Long-term forecasts of military technologies for a 20–30 year horizon: an empirical assessment of accuracy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 137, 272–279 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fye, S., Charbonneau, S., Hay, J. & Mullins, C. An examination of factors affecting accuracy in technology forecasts. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 80, 1222–1231 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, A., Apreda, R. & Fantoni, G. Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 151, 119855 (2020).
Google Scholar
O’Hagan, A., et al. Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts’ Probabilities (Wiley, 2006).
Gonzalez, C., Sanchez-Segura, M. I., Dugarte-Peña, G. L. & Medina-Dominguez, F. Valence matters in judgments of stock accumulation in blood glucose control and other global problems. J. Dyn. Decis. Mak. 4, 3 (2018).
Ziegler, M. S., Song, J. & Trancik, J. E. Determinants of lithium-ion battery technology cost decline. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 6074–6098 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wiser, R. et al. Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs. Nat. Energy 1, 16135 (2016).
Google Scholar
Shiraki, H. & Sugiyama, M. Back to the basic: toward improvement of technoeconomic representation in integrated assessment models. Clim. Change 162, 13–24 (2020).
Ruegg, R., O’Connor, A. C. & Loomis, R. J. Evaluating Realized Impacts of DOE/EERE R&D Programs. Standard Impact Evaluation Method Report DOE/EE-1117 (Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), 2014).
Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1 (UN General Assembly, 2015).
Barrage, L. & Nordhaus, W. Policies, projections, and the social cost of carbon: results from the DICE-2023 model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2312030121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Weitzman, A. Prices vs. quantities. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41, 477–491 (1974).
Google Scholar
Krey, V. et al. MESSAGEix-GLOBIOM Documentation (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2020).
Sepulveda, N. A., Jenkins, J. D., de Sisternes, F. J. & Lester, R. K. The role of firm low-carbon electricity resources in deep decarbonization of power generation. Joule 2, 2403–2420 (2018).
Google Scholar
Peñasco, C., Anadón, L. D. & Verdolini, E. Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 257–265 (2021).
Salo, A., Keisler, J & Morton, A. (eds) Portfolio Decision Analysis: Improved Methods for Resource Allocation International Series in Operations Research & Management Science Vol. 162 (Springer, 2011).
Anadon, L. D., Baker, E. & Bosetti, V. Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions. Nat. Energy 2, 17071 (2017).
Google Scholar
Moore, F. C. et al. Mini-PAGE, an open-source implementation of the PAGE09 integrated assessment model. Sci. Data 5, 180187 (2018).
Google Scholar
Marangoni, G., Lamontagne, J. R., Quinn, J. D., Reed, P. M. & Keller, K. Adaptive mitigation strategies hedge against extreme climate futures. Clim. Change 166, 37 (2021).
Google Scholar
Strnad, F. M., Barfuss, W., Donges, J. F. & Heitzig, J. Deep reinforcement learning in World-Earth system models to discover sustainable management strategies. Chaos 29, 123122 (2019).
Google Scholar
Saltelli, A. A short comment on statistical versus mathematical modelling. Nat. Commun. 10, 3870 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. & Bankes, S. Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis (RAND Corporation, 2003).
National Research Council Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society (National Academies Press, 1996).
Herman, J. D., Reed, P. M., Zeff, H. B. & Characklis, G. W. How should robustness be defined for water systems planning under change? J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 141, 04015012 (2015).
Google Scholar
Marchau, V. A., Walker, W. E., Bloemen, P. J. & Popper, S. W. Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty: from Theory to Practice (Springer, 2019).
Martin, C. J. in Negotiating Agreement in Politics (eds Mansbridge, J. & Martin, C. J.) (American Political Science Association, 2013).
Kasprzyk, J. R., Nataraj, S., Reed, P. M. & Lempert, R. J. Many objective robust decision-making for complex environmental systems undergoing change. Environ. Model. Softw. 42, 55–71 (2013).
Google Scholar
Brunhart-Lupo, N., Bush B., Gruchalla, K., Potter, K. & Smith, S. Collaborative Exploration of Scientific Datasets Using Immersive and Statistical Visualization Report NREL/PR-2C00-79574 (National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), 2021).
Overpeck, J. T., Meehl, G. A., Bony, S. & Easterling, D. R. Climate data challenges in the 21st century. Science 331, 700–702 (2011).
Google Scholar
Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 360, eaas9793 (2018).
Google Scholar
link